Saturday, November 21, 2009

THE REAL CRIME

During the Watergate scandal, it always struck me as ironic that the crime Nixon was most castigated for was the cover-up. Certainly that act was illegal and unethical, and probably the most prosecutable crime, but not the most serious. When the White House burglars broke into Democratic headquarters, the real crime they were committing was treason. This wasn’t just “dirty tricks” or document theft, it was an attempt to undermine the fundamental democratic process, the structure of government, and that is a crime against the state.
It occurs to me that the lobby industry does pretty much the same thing. Political candidates tell the voters where they stand on the issues and (theoretically) how they will vote. The winners are sent to Washington to do as they promised, but before they can do so they are overwhelmed by a heavily financed team of lobbyists. The irony of course is that lobbyists defend their activities under the banner of free speech. Nothing could be further from the truth. Lobbyists are paid influence peddlers, nothing more nothing less. Their job is to undermine the democratic process by putting the needs of their employers ahead of the needs of the voters. It’s time we made this practice illegal.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

MICRO-MANAGEMENT

The battle for health care insurance reform has moved to the Senate, and not surprisingly, one of its primary struggles is over abortions. A number of senators who otherwise might vote in favor of a reform bill – including a public option – will not say yea until they are assured that no federal funds will be used to subsidize abortions. I’m not sure if they’re opposed to abortions themselves or just afraid of offending voters who are, but one way or the other they have drawn a line in the sand.

I'm wondering, what if one senator were opposed to hip replacements, another to plastic surgery, and a third to alcohol re-hab treatment? Should they be allowed to provide an insurance structure for some ailments while blocking it from others? Are they doctors?

Without diving into the abyss of the abortion argument, it should be pointed out that Roe vs. Wade is still the law of the land, and abortion, regardless of how you may feel about it, is a legal medical procedure. Legislative authority ends at the door to the doctor’s office, and should not be allowed inside.

Monday, November 02, 2009

A LETTER FROM THE FRONT

The following is US Foreign Service Officer Matthew P. Hoh's Resignation Letter addressed to Ambassador Nancy J. Powell, Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources:

Ambassador Nancy J. Powell

Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources

U.S. Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, D.C. 20520

Dear Ambassador Powell,

It is with great regret and disappointment I submit my resignation from my appointment as a Political Officer in the Foreign Service and my post as the Senior Civilian Representative for the US Government in Zabul Province. I have served six of the previous ten years in service to our country overseas, to include deployment as a US Marine office and Department of Defense civilian in the Euphrates and Tigris River Valleys of Iraq in 2004-2005 and 2006-2007. I did not enter into this position lightly or with any undue expectations nor did I believe my assignment would be without sacrifice, hardship or difficulty. However, in the course of my five months of service in Afghanistan, in both Regional Commands East and South, I have lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States' presence in Afghanistan. I have doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy, but my resignation is based not upon how we are pursuing this war, but why and to what end. To put simply: I fail to see the value or the worth in continued US casualties or expenditures of resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year old civil war.

This fall will mark the eighth year of US combat, governance and development operations within Afghanistan. Next fall, the United States' occupation will equal in length the Soviet Union's own physical involvement in Afghanistan. Like the Soviets, we continue to secure and bolster a failing state, while encouraging an ideology and system of government unknown and unwanted by its people.

If the history of Afghanistan is one great stage play, the United States is no more than a supporting actor, among several previously, in a tragedy that not only pits tribes, valleys, clans, villages and families against one another, but, from at least the end of King Zahir Shah's reign, has violently and savagely pitted the urban, secular, educated and modern of Afghanistan against the rural, religious, illiterate and traditional. It is this latter group that composes and supports the Pashtun insurgency. The Pashtun insurgency, which is composed of multiple, seemingly infinite, local groups, is fed by what is perceived by the Pashtun people as a continued and sustained assault, going back centuries, on Pashtun land, culture, traditions and religion by internal and external enemies. The US and NATO presence and operations in Pashtun valleys and villages, as well as Afghan army and police units that are led and composed of non- Pashtun soldiers and police, provide an occupation force against which the insurgency is justified. In both RC East and South, I have observed that the bulk of the insurgency fights not for the white banner of the Taliban, but rather against the presence of foreign soldiers and taxes imposed by an unrepresentative government in Kabul (my emphasis).

The United States military presence in Afghanistan greatly contributes to the legitimacy and strategic message of the Pashtun insurgency. In a like manner, our backing of the Afghan government in its current form continues to distance the government from the people (my emphasis). The Afghan government's failings, particularly when weighed against the sacrifice of American lives and dollars, appear legion and metastasis:

· Glaring corruption and unabashed graft;

· A President whose confidants and chief advisors comprise drug lords and war crimes villains, who mock our own rule of law and anit-narcotics efforts;

· A system of provincial and district leaders constituted of local power brokers, opportunists and strongmen allied to the United States solely for and limited by the value of our USAID and CERP contracts, whose own political and economic interests stand nothing to gain from any positive or genuine attempts at reconciliation;

·The recent election process dominated by fraud and discredited by low voter turnout, which has created an enormous victory for our enemy who now claims a popular boycott and will call into worldwide question our government's military, economic and diplomatic support for an invalid and illegitimate Afghan government.

Our support for this kind of government, coupled with a misunderstanding of the insurgency's true nature, reminds me horribly of our involvement with South Vietnam - an unpopular and corrupt government we backed at the expense of our Nation's own internal peace, against an insurgency whose nationalism we arrogantly and ignorantly mistook as a rival to our own Cold War ideology.

I find specious the reasons we ask for bloodshed and sacrifice from our young men and women in Afghanistan. If honest, our stated strategy of securing Afghanistan to prevent an al-Qaeda resurgence or regrouping would require us to also invade and occupy western Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, etc (my emphasis). Our presence in Afghanistan has only increased destabilization and insurgency in Pakistan where we rightly fear a toppled or weakened Pakistani government may lose control of its nuclear weapons. However, again, to follow the logic of our stated goals, we should garrison Pakistan, not Afghanistan. More so, the September 11th attacks, as well as the Madrid and London bombings, were primarily planned and organized in Western Europe, which highlights the fact that the threat is not tied to traditional geographic or political boundaries. Finally, if our real concern is for a failed state crippled by corruption and poverty and under assault from criminal and drug lords, then we must reevaluate and increase our financial and military commitment Mexico (my emphasis)

Eight years into war, no nation has ever known a more dedicated, well trained, experienced and disciplined military as the US Armed Forces. I do not believe any military force has ever been tasked with such a complex, opaque and Sisyphean mission as the US military has received in Afghanistan. The tactical proficiency and performance of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines is unmatched and unquestioned. However, this is not the European or Pacific theaters of World War II, but rather is a war for which our leaders, uniformed, civilian and elected, have inadequately prepared and resourced our men and women. Our forces, devoted and faithful, have been committed to conflict in an indefinite and unplanned manner that has become a cavalier, politically expedient and Pollyannaish misadventure. Similarly, the United States has a dedicated and talented cadre of civilians, both US government employees and contractors, who believe in and sacrifice for their mission, but they have been ineffectually trained and led with guidance and intent shaped more by the political climate in Washington, DC than in Afghan cities, villages, mountains and valleys.

"We are spending ourselves into oblivion" a very talented and intelligent commander, one of America's best, briefs every visitor, staff delegation and senior officer. We are mortgaging our Nation's economy on a war, which, even with increased commitment, will remain a draw for years to come. Success and victory, whatever they may be, will be realized not in years, after billions more spent, but in decades and generations. The United States does not enjoy a national treasury for such success and victory.

I realize the emotion and tone of my letter and ask that you excuse any ill temper. I trust you understand the nature of this war and the sacrifices made by so many thousands separated from loved ones in defense of our nation, whose homes bear the fractures, upheavals and scars of multiple deployments. Thousands of our men and women return home with physical and mental wounds, some that will never heal, some that will worsen with time. The dead return to families who must be reassured that the sacrifice was for a purpose worthy of futures lost, loves vanished, and promised dreams unrealized. I have lost confidence that such assurances can still be made. As such, I submit my resignation.

Sincerely,

Matthew P. Hoh

Senior Civilian Representative

Zabul Province, Afghanistan

Cc: Mr. Frank Ruggiero

Ms. Dawn Liberi

Ambassador Anthony Wayne

Ambassador Karl Eikenberry