Monday, February 22, 2010

BEHIND THE IRONY CURTAIN

There were two items in the media yesterday that caught my attention. They couldn't be more different.

The first story, found in the L.A. Times, was about the drones being used in Afghanistan. There are more than 7,000 of them - used for both observation and actual combat - whose "pilots" are often quite far away. Flying the planes with virtual reality computers, some in fact are located on air bases in the U.S. It is quite possible for one of the "pilots" to wake up in the morning, have breakfast with his wife and kids, drive to work, bomb a village, and be home in time for dinner. Needless to say, the military has discovered that this unique work regimen has created some unique problems. They are working to resolve them.

The second story, on Sunday Morning, also involved foreigners. Three cities were chosen at random - they were located in India, Russia, and Oman - a reporter went to each city, opened the phone book and chose a name; once again, at random. Then he did a story about that person. All three stories were fascinating, unexpected, informative and interesting. It was an extraordinary use of broadcast technology to reach out and touch real people who, otherwise, we could never know.

So, in the first story we find Americans using computer technology to kill people we don't know who may or may not have posed a threat, while in the second story we find Americans using a different technology to reach out to people we don't know in order to gain a deeper understanding of their lives, and perhaps our own. I wonder which strategy will provide greater security in the long run?

Saturday, February 20, 2010

TAKEN FOR A BUS RIDE

Bush Leegers -

I had lunch with my brother yesterday. We chatted about this and that, as brothers do, and finally hit on the subject of mass transit. When I mentioned GM's scandalous destruction of California's transit systems - plus a hundred others around the country - Chuck gave me that unique look of condescension that older brothers specialize in, as if I were a feeble minded conspiracy theorist who deserved pity rather than attention. "Look," he said, speaking slowly so that his slower brother wouldn't miss any of the major points, "even if GM did destroy L.A.'s transit system - which I don't think they did - they couldn't have afforded to buy up a bunch of transit systems around the country. Don't be ridiculous." You gotta admit, it makes sense.

All I had to do was Google "GM destroys transit systems" and I discover a font of information. Ain't it grand? Don't miss the red lines (pardon the pun) - they're the good ones. By the way, though this article attests to GM's activities in California, there is plenty of evidence about their national efforts.

Bart

The Modern Transit Society web site has moved. To obtain this page in the latest version, change "trainweb.org/mts" to "moderntransit.org" in the URL (web address). Below is an archived version (September 2005).
CONTENTS

General Motors' Destruction of California Transit Systems

The Alameda in San Jose crossing underneath SP in 1937. The trolley wire supports on the bridge can be seen to this day. Streetcars provided pollution free, comfortable transportation without receiving any government subsidy. Unfortunately for transit patrons, and all who desire clean air, the competition between transportation competitors was not a fair one.

The destruction of transit in the East Bay and across the Bay Bridge was, unfortunately, typical for California's other large metropolitan areas. The only large city in California where GM did not destroy the transit system was San Francisco. This was because it was not able to do a takeover: San Francisco's transit system was owned by the City. Of course, GM was savvy enough to not directly buy these transit systems. They used "front" companies, funneling the money through them, and when they achieved control, it was the end for the transit system. All without the public's knowledge.

California transit systems destroyed by GM included those in the East Bay, San Jose, Fresno, Stockton, Sacramento, San Diego and the biggest, Los Angeles. There were probably more, but I can prove these from records.

San Jose

What about the San Jose streetcar system? GM has admitted to making an "investment ... in Pacific City Lines beginning in 1938 ..." [in GM's report "The Truth About American Ground Transport," page 21]. San Jose Railroads became a subsidiary of Pacific City Lines [Moody's Manuals]. The streetcar service was discontinued on April 10, 1938.

Hostile takeover attempt of the Key System in 1941

Harre Demoro of the San Francisco Chronicle writes [in his book The Key Route] : "Pacific City Lines was headquartered in Oakland and specialized in acquiring smaller transit systems and converting them from rail to bus. The Key System was among its largest targets at the time [January, 1941], and [Key System president] Lundberg moved quickly to avert a takeover." This 1941 takeover attempt was only made publicly known at a PUC hearing in 1955, because the request by the Key System (GM-controlled) attorney to delete it from the public record was denied. The Key System was not so lucky in 1946.

The Key System takeover in 1946

General Motors has admitted to making "investments" in National City Lines in 1939 and other years (which they didn't all list). This "front" company, National City Lines, acquired 64% of the stock of the Key System (officially the Railway Equipment and Realty Company) in 1946. The destruction of this transit system is detailed in previous pages.

Los Angeles metropolitan area

The Los Angeles system consisted of two companies, Los Angeles Railway, with 1042 yellow streetcars, and Pacific Electric, with 437 red electric cars. At least one line was quad tracked for express train service. Pacific Electric had a subway thru downtown Los Angeles. [Figures from PUC Special Study TR-23, 1944].

General Motors has admitted that "GM made ... investments in American City Lines in 1943." Soon, American City Lines was buying stock in Los Angeles Railway. By May 1, 1945, they owned 59% of the outstanding stock. The same month, the Los Angeles Railway announced plans to scrap most of the streetcar lines [Source: Moody's]. Pacific Electric was acquired in 1953. By then, a number of lines had already been acquired and destroyed via Pacific City Lines [Source: Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly: American Ground Transport, 1974]. The Hollywood Blvd. line was destroyed in 1954 and the Glendale-Burbank line in 1955, both using the subway under downtown LA.

Kerosene was poured on the streetcars and electric trains and they were burned, except a few placed in museums. Nothing was left of the transit system which had comprised 1479 streetcars and train cars. There were also trolley buses by LA Railway.

San Diego

On March 12, 1949, General Motors was convicted for monopoly and violating antitrust laws by a federal court. It was fined merely $5000. The fine was not enough to dissuade GM, because the destructions continued using more elaborate "fronts." For example, the selling of the San Diego streetcar system in 1948 (when GM was under indictment), with 104 streetcars, was "to J. L. Haugh, Oakland, for an undisclosed amount" [Moody's Public Utilities Manuals]. Who is this person? The Key System president installed by GM! Previous to that, he was an executive at Pacific City Lines. San Diego's streetcars, which were the new PCC type - still being used to this day in San Francisco - were scrapped in 1949.

That's not all for J. L. Haugh. In 1953, Jesse L. Haugh "acquired" the Pacific Electric. The real financiers of the takeover were again hidden from the public at the time, but became known later by congressional investigation.

Investors plundered, taxpayers burdened

The last year that dividends were paid on Key System stock was in 1947. This meant that the owners of the Key System stock who were not automobile interests, and who owned 36% of the stock, were, in effect, plundered. Stockholders of the Los Angeles Railway, 41% of which was not owned by automobile interests, were also plundered.

It also meant that what was once a private company, making profit and paying taxes, eventually became both government owned and government subsidized, after GM destroyed both its efficiency and its customer base. This process was repeated in other of GM's transit operations in California. The transit companies also had owned much of the property under their tracks, and paid property taxes which roads never paid.

Taxpayers to this day are burdened with subsidizing bus systems. To a much greater extent, they are burdened with subsidizing automobiles whose numbers are far greater than if the electric systems - with streetcars, trains and trolly buses - had remained intact.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

INSURE THIS!

You may have read the news reports that an increase in insurance rates was coming and that it could be as high as 39%. My cousin, Richard - this is my weekly golf guru - informs me that he just received a rate increase from Blue Shield of exactly 39%. He got the full Monty. His monthly rate will rise from $700 to $1,000. In addition, he has - are you sitting down? - a $7,000 deductible. So Richard, his wife and two insured children will have to spend $19,000 before Blue Shield coughs up a dime.

I'm not sure if this is the "change" we were promised. I was hoping for better.

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

MIXED BAG

"Retarded," which is actually a shortening of the phrase, "mentally retarded," has been replaced in polite conversation by "mentally challenged." I never much cared for that phrase. It sounds to me less like someone with a development problem and more like someone with a discipline problem; like if they would just pay attention they would be okay.

That didn't stop Elizabeth Hasselbeck, the ultra-conservative co-host of The View, from dissing presidential chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel, who apparently used the R word in a private conversation at the White House. Hasselbeck, a survivor of Survivor and a co-host on the show since 2003, was outraged that he would use such a word, and demanded that he be fired ... if not hung. I guess she didn't get the memo about free speech, especially in private conversations. If she really wants to hear some tasteless, private, White House conversations she should get a copy of the Nixon tapes.

Frankly, I don't think she cares a whit about that word; what she really cares about is the chance to point an accusing finger at this administration and say, Ooh, you guys pretend to be so liberal and so socially conscious, but I caught you doing something "bad." Because, of course, Ms. Hasselbeck sees the world in black and white, where everything is either good or bad.

Two popular phrases in my youth were: "You Jewed him down," and, "He gypped me." Should we erase the words Jew and gypsy from the lexicon because they are occasionally used as invectives? I think we should try and muddle through.

--------------------------------------------------

The crossword puzzle in the Times used to be a nice way to wile away an hour or so, though I must say, lately it's gotten so difficult that the fun is gone. And just to put the icing on the cake, they've moved it. It's still on the second-to-the-last page in the Calendar section, but it used to be below the fold. You could fold the paper across, then fold it up-and-down, and be left with a nice, compact unit that you could hold in one hand whilst you held your pen in the other. Now some friggin' moron has moved it up a couple of inches, so that half of it is above the fold and half is below. You can't fold it nice and neat any more. Is it me, or ARE THESE GUYS NUTS!?

------------------------------------------------------

The CEO of Toyota America appeared on Today yesterday, trying to explain away "unexpected acceleration," a euphemism if ever I heard one. Matt Lauer asked pointed questions - what did you know and when did you know it - and the CEO answered politely, though he looked to me like a pig roasting on a spit. The man was sweating bullets.

I'm not quite sure what everyone is so upset about. Driving is dangerous. 50,000 people are killed on the road every year. If Toyota was really upset, they'd make cars with a top speed of only 65 mph, which would save about 40,000 of those 50,000 lives. Of course, they probably wouldn't sell as many cars, and that would make them even more upset. Hey, these are tough choices.


FALSE ADVERTISING

Cruising through the online news flashes I came across this item:

POLITICO Breaking News:
-----------------------------------------------------

A politically diverse group of bloggers, commentators, techies and politicos on Wednesday will launch an online campaign, Demand Question Time, urging President Barack Obama and GOP congressional leaders to hold regular, televised conversations like the extraordinary exchange in Baltimore on Friday. Supporters include Grover Norquist, Joe Trippi, Mark McKinnon, Ed Morrissey, Ari Melber, Katrina vanden Heuvel and David Corn.

This sounds like a great idea. The name that pops out at me, though, is the first one on the list: Grover Norquist may sound like a character from a novel but he's real enough. Norquist was a prominent Young Republican in college, a dirty trickster, and a long-time friend and associate of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is currently serving time in federal prison. Without knowing any more, I would say that anything Norquist is involved in is, at the very least, suspect. Why Joe Trippi, a big time Democratic strategist, is involved is a bit of a mystery.

In any case, keep your eyes open for "Demand Question Time." Let's see where it goes.